This book, Understanding Community Interpreting Services: Diversity and Access in Australia and Beyond by Oktay Eser, Department of Translation and Interpreting, Amasya University, Turkey, is a welcome addition to the field. The author conducted his post-doctoral research on Community Inter preting (CI) at RMIT University in Melbourne, under the supervision of and in collaboration with Dr. Miranda Lai of that University. It was the late Dr. Sedat Mulayim who had initially alerted the author to the field of Community Interpreting, and this book is dedicated to Dr. Mulayim. Australia was one of the first countries to establish credentialing for interpreters and translators at various levels by establishing the National Accreditation Authority for Translators and Interpreters in 1977 (Hlavac 2016, p. 61). In 2012 Professor Sandra Hale and colleagues presented the report of an investigation they had conducted at the request of NAATI (Hale et al. 2012). The report recommended that NAATI testing only be available to candidates who had undertaken training From 2018 onwards, NAATI accreditation is only valid for three years. All certified translators and interpreters must keep a log of assignments undertaken as evidence that they are maintaining their skills. The author describes the situation in Australia from what I refer to as ‘an outsider-insider’ perspective. He is enough of an outsider to be able to have a broad perspective on Community Interpreting services in Australia. This outsider gaze is helped by the fact that he looks at Commu nity Interpreting from two different perspectives: interpreting studies and management studies. The outsider perspective is also helped by the fact that he looks at the situation in Australia as a whole, and the state of Victoria in particular as a visiting scholar. Eser received support from scholars at RMIT University in Melbourne which allowed him to connect with important stakeholders, such as the CEO of NAATI, Mark Painting, Niki Baras, Organiser of the Translators and Interpreters branch of Profes sionals Australia, Frans Moens, Head of strategic projects with Victorian Interpreting and Translating Services (VITS) LanguageLoop and many others. At the same time, his status as an insider/scholar in the area of inter preting studies allows him to ask the right questions of the stakeholders he interviews. This insider status also allows him to ‘ask the right ques tions’ of policy and other documents he consults and facilitates his ability to work with the NVivo qualitative analysis tool. After all, it is only an insider who could make sense of the ‘nodes’ or recurrent themes, while it requires both an insider and an outsider gaze to make sense of these nodes, by looking at them with the broad yet insightful gaze required. Eser uses the management services lens to discuss supply and demand, quality of services, casualization and so on. At the same time, the author is able to zoom in on important details, facilitated by interviews with stakeholders. Community Interpreting has also been referred to as Liaison Inter preting (Gentile, Ozolins and Vasilakakos 1996) and is often referred to as Public Service Interpreting (PSI) (e.g. Enriquez Raido, Crezee and Ridgeway 2020). The author refers to seminal work on Community Inter preting by impactful scholars such as Hale (2007) and Corsellis (2008). Personally, I quite like the term ‘Community Interpreting’ because of the connection this creates with the concept of community translation, as defined by Taibi and Ozolins (2016): like community translation, community interpreting facilitates community access to important public service information. It also provides members of migrant and refugee communities with a voice.
